 |
|
NOTE: The advertised online survey closed at 4pm EDT on
April 3, 2006. An overview of the results will be presented at
"The New ACSM Standards and Guidelines Manual Updates" session at the
ACSM Health & Fitness Summit & Exposition to be held April 11-14
in Orlando, Florida.
View
Planned Health/Fitness Facility Standards
|

|
The American College of Sports Medicine Wants Your Input on
ACSM's Health/Fitness Facility Standards and Guidelines, Third
Edition
Article by Stephen Tharrett, M.S.
The fitness and health club industry has always been a very
entrepreneurial industry. This entrepreneurial spirit is one reason the
industry has achieved the level of public acceptance it has today. One
of the results of a growing industry is that its business practices come
under greater scrutiny from government and related public audiences
(e.g. associations and public advocacy groups, etc.). This is the case
currently with the fitness and health club industry. Our industry has
evolved, entered new markets and, is serving populations that previously
would not have been members of fitness and health club facilities. This
change in the market demographics has played a role in the increasing
demand for government oversight in regards to health and safety related
issues (e.g. automated external defibrillators, licensing and/or
registration of personal trainers, etc.).
Standards and guidelines that are developed well, executed well and,
governed well by an industry, reduce the need for government oversight.
Public policy leaders have shared with business leaders the importance
of self-regulation through meaningful standards. These public policy
leaders have made it clear that when an industry does a good job of
self-regulation, it reduces the likelihood that government will step in
to provide oversight.
The American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) first released a set
of health/fitness facility standards for the industry in 1992. This
initial effort to develop and promote a set of standards for the
industry was not well received by the industry. This was in due in part
to the fact that the industry was not yet ready for self regulation, but
also the resulted from a process that did not fully engage the industry.
In 1997, ACSM released a second edition of the standards. The second
edition represented a marked improvement on the first edition, as it
involved more fitness industry leaders in the process, including getting
members of the board of the world's largest club trade association,
IHRSA, involved. While the second edition represented a more acceptable
set of industry standards and guidelines, it still did not have the
impact that was hoped, nor were these standards able to lessen the
demand for government intervention.
Entering 2004, the fitness and health club industry was receiving
mounting pressure from government agencies and other groups to set a
higher standard of care for itself, particularly as it applies to issues
of health and safety for facility users. Issues such as fitness
professional credentialing, public access defibrillation (PAD), and
pre-activity screening were being brought to the attention of the
industry, the public and government. Much of this attention was caused
by the increased availability of fitness facilities serving markets that
were composed of individuals with much higher health risks than ever
before.
In response to this increased attention regarding health and safety
issues ACSM felt it was time to embark on the creation of a third
edition of its health/fitness facility standards and guidelines. In 2005
the College put together a distinguished panel of industry experts (see
Figure 1 for a list of the editorial board) from the commercial fitness
club business, the YMCAs, colleges and universities, and the medical and
exercise physiology fields (collectively representing more than 500
years of combined industry experience). This esteemed editorial board
began work on writing a new set of health/fitness facility standards
that would address the health and safety needs and practices of both the
industry and the public at large. This effort was a huge undertaking and
was done with the best of intentions. The ultimate goal was to offer the
health and fitness industry a set of standards and guidelines that would
address these health and safety issues being set forth by various public
advocacy groups, by courts rendering decisions in legal cases and, by
government. Ultimately, the College and the editorial team believed this
most recent version of the standards would provide a means of elevating
industry practice as it applied to health and safety issues for users
and, concurrently would allow for a sufficient amount of entrepreneurial
freedom for clubs.
|
Figure 1: Members of the ACSM Standards Editorial
Board
Stephen Tharrett, M.S.,
President
Club Industry Consulting
Former IHRSA president |
James A. Peterson, Ph.D.,
FACSM
Healthy Learning |
Kyle McInnis, Sc.D., FACSM
University of Massachusetts |
Barry Franklin, Ph.D., FACSM
William Beaumont Hospital |
Cedric Bryant, Ph.D., FACSM
Chief Exercise Physiologist and VP
American Council on Exercise |
Rick Caro, President
Management Vision, Inc.
IHRSA founder and former president |
Paul Couzelis, Ph.D., President
Medfit Corporate Services |
Rob Goldman, Vice President
Columbia Association
Former IHRSA president |
Neil Gordon, M.D., FACSM
St. Joseph Candler Health System |
William Herbert, Ph.D., FACSM
Virginia Tech |
Hervey Lavoie, President
Ohlson Lavoie Design
Collaborative |
Carol Nalevanko, President
DMB Sports Former
IHRSA board member |
Frank Napolitano, SVP
Town Sports International
Former IHRSA president |
Carl Porter, President
Medsport Enterprises
Former IHRSA board member |
Michael Spezzano
YMCA of USA |
David Herbert, JD
Herbert & Benson, Attorneys at Law |
Jennifer Turgiss, M.S.
International Director of Fitness
Virgin Active |
Dan Connaughton, Ed.D.
University of Florida |
| As of January 2006, the editorial team has created a draft set of
health/fitness facility standards and guidelines intended to be released
later in 2006. The editorial team, with input from other organizations,
believes that the next step in the process is to create an industry-wide
dialogue regarding the standards and guidelines document. This article
is intended to be the first step in initiating that dialogue with the
industry. Figure 2 below are the proposed standards to be released later
in 2006. Most of the newly proposed standards are merely a more detailed
description of the existing standards. The exceptions are the two
standards related to automated external defibrillators, one that
addresses the need for clubs to have an AED and one that pertains to the
need for all staff involved in performing pre-activity screening,
counseling and fitness instruction to have AED/CPR certification. These
two standards may be the most controversial to the industry, but the
editorial team felt after careful review of existing AED research,
public policy legislation (five states require AEDs in clubs and another
seven states are considering legislation), statements from the American
Heart Association, and current fitness industry practice, that AEDs need
to be a part of every health/fitness facilities emergency response
system. |
Figure 2: Planned Health/Fitness Facility
Standards
- All facilities offering exercise equipment or services must offer a
general pre-activity cardiovascular risk screening (e.g. Par-Q) and/or a
specific pre-activity screening tool (e.g. health risk appraisal "HRA"
or health history questionnaire "HHQ") to all new members and
prospective users.
- All specific pre-activity screening tools (e.g. HRA, HHQ) must be
interpreted by qualified staff and the results of the screening must be
documented.
- If a facility becomes aware that a member or user has known
cardiovascular, metabolic or pulmonary disease, or two or more major
cardiovascular risk factors, or any other major self-disclosed medical
concern, that person must be advised to consult with a qualified
healthcare provider before beginning a moderate to vigorous physical
activity program.
- All facilities with qualified staff must offer each new member a
general orientation to the facility, including identification of
resources available for personal assistance with developing a suitable
physical activity program and the proper use of any exercise equipment
to be used in that program.
- Facilities must have in place a written system for sharing
information with users and employees or independent contractors
regarding the handling of potentially hazardous materials, including the
handling of bodily fluids by the facility staff in accordance with the
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA).
- Facilities must have written policies for emergency response systems
and procedures that must be reviewed and rehearsed regularly. These
policies must be capable of handling basic first-aid situations and
emergency cardiac events.
- Facilities must have as part of their written emergency response
system a public access defibrillation (PAD) program.
- The fitness and healthcare professionals who have supervisory
responsibility for the physical activity programs (supervise and oversee
members, users, staff and independent contractors) of the facility must
demonstrate the appropriate professional education, certification, or
experience.
- The fitness and healthcare professionals who serve in counseling,
instructional, and physical activity supervision roles for the facility
must demonstrate the appropriate professional education, certification,
or experience.
- Fitness and healthcare professionals engaged in pre-activity
screening, instructing, monitoring, or supervising of physical activity
programs for facility members or users must have current automated
external defibrillation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (AED and CPR)
certification from an organization qualified to provide such
certification.
- Facilities, to the extend required by law, must adhere to the
building design standards that relate to the designing, building,
expanding, or renovating of space as presented by the Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA).
- Facilities must be in compliance with all federal, state and local
building codes.
- The aquatic and pool facilities must provide proper safety equipment
and signage according to state and local codes and regulations.
- Facilities must have a system in operation that monitors the entry
to and usage of the facilities by all individuals, including members and
users.
- Facilities that offer a sauna, steam room, or whirlpool must make
sure that these areas are maintained at the proper temperature and that
the appropriate warning systems are in place to notify members and users
of unwarranted changes in temperature.
- Facilities that offer members and users access to a pool or
whirlpool must make sure that the water in the pool is maintained in
accordance with state and local codes.
- A facility that offers youth services or programs must provide
appropriate supervision.
- Facilities must post the appropriate caution, danger and warning
signage in conspicuous locations where existing conditions and
situations warrant such signage.
- Facilities must post the appropriate emergency and safety signage
pertaining to fire and related emergency situations, as required by
federal, state, and local codes.
- Facilities must post all required ADA and OSHA signage.
- All cautionary, danger, and warning signage must have the required
signal icon, signal word, signal color, and layout, as specified by the
American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and reflected in the
American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) standards for fitness
equipment and fitness facility safety signage and labels.
|
|
On behalf of ACSM's Health/Fitness Facility Standards and
Guidelines, third edition Editorial Board, we want to confirm our
desire to make this process of producing a set of well-accepted
standards for the fitness and health club industry as inclusive as
possible. In this way, our great industry can continue to self-regulate
in a manner that promotes the health and safety of consumers and,
provides a business environment that allows owners and operators of
fitness and health facility businesses the opportunity to maintain the
appropriate degree of entrepreneurial freedom.
|
|
 |