ACSM Blog
Menu

In This Section:

  • Active Voice | How to Prescribe Exercise for Brain Health

    by Greg Margason | Jan 10, 2024
    How to Prescribe Exercise for Brain Health

    Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias are among the world’s foremost health and economic challenges, impacting over 55 million people worldwide and costing more than 1.3 trillion U.S. dollars in 2019 alone. With no imminent cure, there is an urgent need for interventions that reduce dementia risk in healthy older adults. 

    Physical exercise is one of the greatest modifiable risk factors for dementia. Yet, exercise prescriptions for brain health in older adults are lacking. Unfortunately, the consequences of this are twofold. First, people may undervalue the clinical utility of exercise for dementia prevention, and second, it poses a barrier to the recommendation of exercise for healthy aging in primary care settings. Our graphical review, published in Exercise, Sport, and Movement, attempts to remedy this by providing evidence-based exercise prescription principles for dementia prevention as a starting point to help guide clinical practice and research. 

    Building on current scientific evidence, we reviewed the state of knowledge concerning brain-level changes that occur with aging. We included details on why memory is impacted in healthy aging and how these changes progress toward dementia. To help readers understand how exercise promotes the brain’s health, we described pertinent physiological mechanisms through which exercise impacts the brain to support memory. Ultimately, we synthesized this fundamental knowledge into practical exercise prescription principles to help individuals and practitioners formulate evidence-informed exercise programs to support brain health. 

    A notable strength was our use of the FITT framework — which details the frequency, intensity, time and type of exercise — thus providing the necessary components for formulating effective exercise prescriptions. We highlighted the similarities and differences in the suggested exercises for brain health versus those recommended by ACSM for cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal and neuromotor fitness. Respecting the reality that one size does not fit all, we offer a flexible formula for creating exercise prescriptions that can be adapted to fit everyone’s unique needs. 

    That said, the evidence suggests that certain types and intensities of exercise should be incorporated into every exercise prescription for brain health. Specifically, exercise “type” should include aerobic (walking, cycling, swimming, etc.), resistance (free weights, resistance bands, yoga, Tai Chi, etc.) or a blend of both types of exercise. Exercise “intensity” should include moderate to vigorous activities relative to the individual’s baseline cardiorespiratory fitness capabilities. In contrast, exercise “frequency” and “time” (duration) permit more freedom. Instead of setting a rigid threshold, the emphasis is on some physical activity is better than no physical activity (i.e., being sedentary), with the understanding that brain health is best supported by consistent engagement in regular exercise. 

    As a starting point, we encourage practitioners to download the final figure of our graphical review, Figure 4, to initiate conversations about exercise with their clients. Practitioners are also encouraged to use behavioral change techniques like brief action planning and SMART goal setting to help their clients create and commit to an exercise plan that is feasible for them. For practitioners with limited experience with exercise prescription, a referral to an ACSM Certified Clinical Exercise Physiologist® can ensure each patient receives the appropriate guidance. 

    With the growing aging population and the rising prevalence of dementia, it has never been more important to optimize exercise programming for better brain health. We hope these principles for prescribing exercise for brain health will help stave off cognitive decline one step at a time. 

    Jennifer Heisz
    Jennifer Heisz, Ph.D.,
    is an associate professor in kinesiology at McMaster University, director of the NeuroFit lab, and author of Move the Body, Heal the Mind. She is the interim editor-in-chief for ACSM’s premier open-access journal, Exercise, Sport, and Movement. Her research examines how physical activity promotes brain function, mental health and cognition in young adults, older adults and individuals with Alzheimer’s disease. 


    Emma Waddington

    Emma Waddington, M.Sc.,
    is a McMaster University alumna and member of the NeuroFit lab. Her work examines the impact of orienteering training on cognitive function and has been featured in The New York Times, NBC and others. 


    Viewpoints presented in ACSM Bulletin commentaries reflect opinions of the authors and do not necessarily represent positions or policies of ACSM. Active Voice authors who have received financial or other considerations from a commercial entity associated with their topic must disclose such relationships at the time they accept an invitation to write for the ACSM Bulletin. 

  • Clinical Highlights from Current Sports Medicine Reports

    by Caitlin Kinser | Jan 09, 2024

    Quarterly Editor's Picks, CSMR journal cover and headshot of editor Dr. Shawn KaneOne of the best parts of Current Sports Medicine Reports (CSMR) are the interesting and educational case reports that are submitted. They are informative and highlight interesting clinical cases that help to increase our knowledge base and remind us to maintain a high degree of clinical suspicion and to keep searching for answers when things just don’t add up like they should.

    I would like to highlight three not-to-be-missed cases from the past quarter:

    Blunt Ocular Trauma in Sport submitted by Daniel, et al. is an interesting (and must say scary) case of traumatic vision loss while playing soccer. Player sustained trauma to the eye from a kicked ball and had 30 minutes of monocular blindness prior to seeking medical care. The player was appropriately diagnosed and treated for traumatic iritis and commotio retinae and was able to return to play with complete resolution of symptoms. The authors of this interesting case report go on to discuss what is needed for a timely and thorough sideline assessment as well as the differential diagnosis for ocular trauma. 

    Popping Pimples or Bones? A Clinical Vignette of a Lacrosse Player on Isotretinoin with Multifocal Lower-Extremity Bone Stress Injuries submitted by D’Amico and Schroeder. This case to me highlights the importance of taking a good history, doing a thorough medication reconciliation, and searching for answers when things do not add up. I am sure many of us have a lot of patients taking isotretinoin for acne and if they have a bone stress injury would you think about stopping the use of isotretinoin? 

    Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP) Treatment of a Quadriceps Tendon Tear in a Collegiate Basketball Athlete submitted by Lutz, et al. is an interesting case using PRP to treat a quadriceps tear. Extrapolating data from the treatment of patellar tendon injuries the authors used PRP as well as traditional rehabilitation to treat the injury and return to athlete to sport. One highlight that is important for this case is the authors thoroughly and objectively describe the components of their PRP injection and rehabilitation program, so that others can replicate it. 

    We also have awesome articles that cover a variety of areas, and I would like to highlight three from the past quarter:

    Assessment of the Current State of Sports Coverage Participation, Training, and Confidence Ratings among PMR Residents and Residency Programs submitted by Stokes, et al. This is an article in our Clinical Curriculum Series, and it shows that exposure to sports medicine during training leads to confidence. While completed with PMR residencies, I am pretty sure this would be similar amongst all Sports Medicine disciplines.  Hopefully, this information can help other programs dedicate time to sports medicine interests. 

    Clinical Considerations in Returning Pediatric and Young Adults with Cancer to Physical Activity submitted by Dykowski, et al. We know that physical activity is beneficial and can be an adjunct treatment for many conditions. When and how to get patients with cancer diagnoses back to physical activity can be challenging due multiple variables. The authors of this paper do to an excellent job at providing some guidance on clinical considerations when contemplating a return to activity. As we continue to improve cancer treatments, getting patients exercising will be good for their physical and mental health. 

    Lastly, as we continue to address the conditions of pediatric obesity and inactivity, I would like to highlight the article May the Force Be with Youth: Foundational Strength for Lifelong Development submitted by Faigenbaum, et al. I would suggest that every Primary Care Sports Medicine provider read this and share it with their Primary Care Colleagues.  This article provides excellent information on not only the why this concept is important but also provides some excellent information on how to address it. This is crucial for the long-term health, wellness, and safety of our nation. 

    CSMR is ACSM’s official monthly clinical-review e-journal. Written specifically for physician and clinician members, CSMR articles provide thorough overviews of the most current sports medicine literature. ACSM physician members receive an online subscription to this journal as a member benefit.

    Shawn Kane headshot 2024Shawn F. Kane, MD, FACSM is a family physician, associate professor in the Department of Family Medicine, and adjunct assistant professor in the Department of Exercise and Sports Science at the University of North Carolina (UNC) Chapel Hill. He received his medical degree from the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences and served in the U.S. Army for 27 years. While in the Army he spent more than 18 years serving as a physician-leader in numerous units within the US Army Special Operations Command. He is interested in sports medicine, concussion care, veterans’ health, and primary care of patients with post-traumatic stress disorder. Dr. Kane joined ACSM in 2003 and became a fellow in 2011. He currently serves as the editor-in-chief for
    Current Sports Medicine Reports, on ACSM’s Clinical Sports Medicine Leadership Committee, ACSM’s Health & Fitness Summit Program Committee, and ACSM’s Program Committee. Outside of the office, Dr. Kane enjoys hanging out with his Leonbergers (big furry, cute German Mountain dogs), as well as working out and traveling.

  • Top News Articles of 2023

    by Caitlin Kinser | Dec 19, 2023
    top news stories 2023 with various designs in dark and light blue, yellow and withThousands of news articles and media stories are published/aired every year that cite ACSM subject matter experts and publications. These are the five articles with the widest reach published in 2023.

    ACSM gets a GREAT shoutout from Al Roker on The Today Show and another story on NBC’s Nightly News (NBC News)

    "If you're sitting all day, science shows how to undo the health risks. Take 'activity snacks' every 30 minutes."

    During the segment, a study published in the journal of the American College of Sports Medicine cites researchers at Columbia University who say that there are health benefits to walking for five minutes every half hour.


    MSN.com
    and USA Today cover the announcement of America's Fittest Cities

    "What is the fittest city in America? The answer has a lot to do with sleep and mental health"

    This story delivered a huge potential reach of 514M and included several mentions of ACSM along with a quote from ACSM’s American Fitness Index spokesperson Stella Volpe.

    "We need people to be more physically active," said Stella Volpe, chair of the American Fitness Index Advisory Board and ACSM president-elect. "It doesn't have to be running a marathon. It could be out for a walk with your friends, your dogs, your family."


    NPR: Morning Edition
    and CNN cover an article published in MSSE

    "Sitting all day can be deadly. 5-minute walks can offset harms" | NPR

    "Sitting too much is bad for your health, but offsetting the impact is easy, study shows" | CNN

    In both stories, researcher and ACSM member Keith Diaz of Columbia University Medical Center describes how he and his colleagues set out to find out what's the least amount of physical activity a person must do to offset the health risks of sitting. They recruited volunteers to come to their lab and emulate a typical work day. The NPR story also sources ACSM member Dr. Robert Sallis.

    Media seek the expertise of ACSM members following the on-field collapse of NFL athlete Damar Hamlin

    "After Damar Hamlin's cardiac arrest, attention turns to chest pads for young athletes" | NBC News

    "What to Know About Damar Hamlin's Heart Event, Commotio Cordis" | TIME

    In both stories, ACSM Chief Medical Officer Dr. Bill Roberts is sourced. '"If we're looking at the risk reduction of adding a chest plate, compared to the risk reduction of training everybody in hands-only CPR having an AED available at sites, it would fall heavily on CPR and AEDs in terms of lives saved,' said Roberts, who is affiliated with the American College of Sports Medicine."

    Indianapolis, ranked 97th out of 100 in the American Fitness Index, receives multi-million dollar grant to improve local parks

    "Indy Parks to get $80M in grants from Lilly Endowment" - The planned projects will take place through 2025. | WTHR Channel 13 (NBC, Indianapolis)

    "This investment is massive in terms of infrastructure within parks,” said Gretchen Patch, American College of Sports Medicine senior director of strategic health initiatives and partnerships. “But it has to be complemented by long-term programming and engagement with those community partners. You can't just throw money at a problem and fix it, but it can get things started." 

  • Why Checking the Box to Exercise isn’t Sufficient for Your Health

    by Greg Margason | Dec 19, 2023
    Why Checking the Box to Exercise isn’t Sufficient for Your Health

    Scenario: The sound of an alarm wakes you up at 6:30 a.m. to start your day. Upon waking up, you decide to go for a jog at the local park, but you are restricted to 30 minutes because of a work meeting scheduled for 8:30 at the office. After exercising, you sit down to pour your favorite cereal and eat breakfast, before driving to work for 20 minutes. You arrive in time for your meeting, which lasts longer than expected, ending around 10. Once the meeting is over, you return to your office to catch up on emails and tasks before going to lunch meeting with a few co-workers. While at lunch, you and your co-workers share personal stories and work-related updates for about an hour before returning to the office to finish up tasks and additional meetings prior to leaving work at 4:30 p.m. After leaving work, you drive back home to cook dinner leftovers before watching television until bedtime around 10 p.m. A similar but different routine repeats the following day - but why is this important even though you exercised?! 

    The 24-hour day entails four distinct behaviors called the 24-hour activity cycle. These behaviors are sleep, sedentary behavior, light physical activity, and moderate to vigorous physical activity. Current physical activity guidelines recommend that adults engage in at least 150 minutes per week of moderate physical activity, at least 75 minutes per week of vigorous physical activity or some combination of both. Sedentary behavior recommendations suggest adults “sit less and move more” due to a paucity of evidence during the development of the 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. Finally, the National Sleep Foundation recommends that adults sleep at least seven hours a day. Thus, accurately measuring all these behaviors and meeting their recommendations pose a challenge. 

    All of behaviors of the 24-hour activity cycle are individually and independently associated with health. Ample evidence suggests that more time spent in moderate to vigorous physical activity and less time in sedentary behavior reduces the risk of a wide range of negative health outcomes such as hypertension, diabetes, cancer, cardiovascular disease, stroke, and a shorter mortality. By contrast, more time spent in sedentary behavior and less time in moderate to vigorous physical activity increases the risk of these negative health outcomes. Finally, current evidence also suggests a short sleep duration (less than seven hours per day) also poses similar negative health consequences as sedentary behavior. As such, growing evidence has now suggested that the combined effects of all these behaviors may be greater than their individual effects.  

    Time spent in one of these complex behaviors will offset time spent in the remaining behaviors. Meeting the aerobic physical activity recommendations or exercising for an hour each day, constitutes only about two percent of a 24-hour day. The remaining 98% of our day and behaviors (sleep, sedentary behavior and light physical activity) should be considered. Meta-analytical evidence suggests even if an individual meets the aerobic physical activity recommendations and engages in high levels of sedentary time throughout the day, the risk of mortality remains high. Previous research has also shown that even physical activity-focused programs do not yield meaningful reductions in sedentary time as an individual can be physically active (e.g. exercise 30 min/day) and yet spend the rest of the day sedentary. Thus, focusing efforts on a single behavior limits efficacy and may lead to spurious conclusions for our health. 

    To help inform a paradigm shift in this area future progress should be established in different areas. Research investigation should consider examining efforts to determine appropriate levels of sleep, sedentary behavior, light physical activity, and moderate to vigorous physical activity (or in certain combinations) to establish optimal 24-hour day recommendations. The fitness and medical community may also benefit in this area by exploring innovative tactics to understand time spent beyond their client’s exercise session to design a healthy 24-hour day.  

    More information about the 24-hour activity cycle can be found in three distinct continuing education courses. 

    Benjamin BoudreauxBenjamin D. Boudreaux, Ph.D. is a postdoctoral fellow at Columbia University Irving Medical Center. His research area of emphasis lies at the intersection of exercise science and physical activity epidemiology. His primary research interests includes examining the relationship between the 24-Hour Activity Cycle in the prevention or treatment of cardiovascular disease and other human health outcomes. He has extensive experience with consumer wearable devices in different populations for validation purposes or as a tool to alter physical activity and sedentary behaviors. Beyond research, Dr. Boudreaux devotes his service efforts towards the disability and Type 1 Diabetes communities such as running the 2023 TCS NYC Marathon for Type 1 Diabetes awareness and presenting or publishing about the importance of physical activity and exercise in the autism community.


  • Navigating the Impact of New Weight Loss Medications

    by Greg Margason | Dec 18, 2023
    Navigating new weight loss medications

    Ozempic™, Wegovy™, Mounjaro™, and now, Zepbound™ - everywhere you turn, you hear about these new medications that have changed the weight loss world and are making a major impact on chronic diseases. The reality is that while 2023 has been flooded with media and excitement, it will likely continue - these effective medications promote, on average, 15-20+ percent weight loss.  

    Now that these new medications are here, can we forget about diet and exercise when it comes to weight loss? 

    If you asked me 20 years ago if I would be talking to you about using medications as a strategy for weight loss – I would have said, “No.”  

    However, after working with thousands of people seeking to lose weight in both research and real-world settings, I now understand the complexity of obesity as a disease. Sometimes the path to weight loss using the traditional “eat less and exercise more” method is not enough, and additional support with medical management (like taking a medication) is needed.  

    I get how confusing this can be, especially with all the media attention these new medications are getting and all the mixed messages out there. To simplify, let’s breakdown some common misconceptions that I hear a lot. Spoiler alert: being physically active is still important! 

    #1 – Ozempic™ is the Magic Bullet for Weight Loss 

    Ozempic™ is approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, not weight loss. The two popular medications that are FDA (Food and Drug Administration) approved for weight loss are semaglutide (Wegovy™) and tirzepatide (Zepbound™). These medications were originally approved for type 2 diabetes and later approved for weight loss, which explains why there are different trade names.

    So, are Wegovy™ and Zepbound™ the magic bullets for weight loss?  

    These medications are called nutrient-stimulated hormone therapies, and the name gives a clue to how they work in our bodies. Here is your quick and basic physiology lesson:  

    Nutrient-stimulated hormones signal our brain in ways that impact how much food we eat – this can be anything from how hungry you feel to whether or not you have food cravings. These new medications mimic those hormones in the body to reduce hunger levels and help people feel fuller longer. With that, people that respond to these medications, typically eat less which can lead to weight loss. 

    While these new weight loss medications are an effective tool, in general they are only impacting how much you eat, not how well. They also are not helping you move more. This is why these medications need to be a part of a broader plan that includes a physical activity and healthy eating strategy, and possible behavioral counseling to help you learn about underlying feelings and strategies to support weight loss.  

    Your healthcare provider is the best person to help you understand: 

    • If, when, and which weight loss medication might be right for you;  

    • The appropriate way it should be taken, whether you qualify; and, 

    • The best comprehensive treatment approach that includes eating better and moving more. 

    #2 – Weight Loss = Willpower 

    Sure, eating healthier and exercising more takes some self-discipline. Unfortunately, life and real barriers can get in the way. In fact, there are many other factors that can impact your weight – everything from your genetics, to how you sleep, where you live, and other dynamics that may increase your drive to eat, such as emotions, hormones, or other medical treatments – to just name a few. All of this can make “eating less and moving more,” MORE difficult over time.  

    To blame weight loss failures on willpower is assuming everything mentioned above is under your control, which it’s not.  

    People taking weight loss medications report that they have better control over their hunger and no longer have intrusive thoughts related to food. That removes some of the willpower challenges (yay!). 

    But let’s get back to the healthy lifestyle strategy. Let’s face it, figuring out how to build a healthy lifestyle is not always easy, with or without a weight loss medication. This is where I encourage you to get support from a professional.  

    Rule No. 1 – if someone tells you they have “the perfect” weight loss method or program, do not engage! Whether you are seeking dietary or physical activity support, only work with professionals who spend time determining what is best FOR you, not just overlaying their method ON you. Seek out support from registered dietitians and certified exercise professionals with experience in weight management and behavior change strategies.  

    #3 You Can Use a Medication to Quickly Lose Weight and Skip Diet and Exercise  

    I hear this constantly in my work, and sadly it is promoted a lot by influencers and celebrities. It sounds like the perfect solution, especially if you have previously struggled to lose weight with diet and exercise alone. Unfortunately, talking about using the medications in this manner is not recommended for several reasons:  

    First, all these medications were tested and approved for use alongside a lifestyle program that includes healthy eating and physical activity. Using a medication without modifying diet and moving more is against what is recommended!  

    Secondly, once a person comes off the medication, those hunger signals will come back, and this can be followed by weight regain.  

    Third, any time you lose weight, you don’t just lose fat mass, but also lean mass. This is typical, but there is concern that higher levels of lean mass loss might be occurring with these newer weight loss medications.  

    A big question is whether the lean mass that is lost is actually your muscle mass.  

    Most people don’t realize this, but the terms “lean mass” and “muscle mass” are not the same. Muscle mass is only one aspect of your body’s lean mass. Researchers are currently studying the effect these medications have on lean mass loss that includes not only muscle but also bone, water, organs, and other body tissues.  

    Why does this matter to you? Some people taking these medications report feeling weaker and taking care of your muscular health may help.  

    This is where exercise may play an important role. 

    Will resistance training completely preserve lean mass or muscle mass loss? The verdict is still out, and the answer is likely no. But we do know that resistance training is still beneficial for you during weight loss, and of course can improve feelings of weakness, and your overall strength and physical function.  

    Some people taking these medications also report feeling fatigued or tired even though they have lost weight.  

    Overtime, participating in a regular exercise program can improve feelings of fatigue. Moderate-intensity physical activity, as simple as brisk walking, can be a great place to start to increase stamina.  

    Have I convinced you yet that these medications are not quick fix for weight loss?!?!  

    Bottom line – a foundation in healthy eating patterns and a physical activity plan are critically important to support your weight loss journey to have you feeling your very best! They may help you keep the weight off and provide health benefits beyond what happens on the scale.  

    ReneeJRogers Headshot
    Dr. Renee J. Rogers, Ph.D., FACSM,
     is a senior scientist at the University of Kansas Medical Center and also works as an independent healthy lifestyle consultant and strategist. She chairs ACSM’s Strategic Health Initiative on Behavioral Strategies and Summit Program Committees. Dr. Rogers is an expert in bio-behavioral intervention design with a focus on relevant engagement approaches that blends her 20+ years of experience working in exercise physiology, behavior change, and weight management. 

12345678910...