ACSM Blog
Menu

In This Section:

  • GSSI Presented Webinar Q&A | The Female Athlete: Energy and Nutrition Issues

    by Greg Margason | Oct 26, 2023

    Miss the webinar? Access it below.

    Webinar Recording
    line with grey, dark blue and light blue sections

    The Female Athlete Energy and Nutrition IssuesQ: In the carb loading studies, what method did they use to measure the glycogen stores?

    In the two studies described in the presentation muscle biopsies were used to measure muscle glycogen stores. The references for the two studies are listed below, if more information is required:

    Tarnopolsky LJ, MacDougall JD, Atkinson SA, Tarnopolsky MA, Sutton JR. Gender differences in substrate for endurance exercise. J Appl Physiol. 1990 Jan;68(1):302-8. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1990.68.1.302. PMID: 2179207.

    Tarnopolsky MA, Zawada C, Richmond LB, Carter S, Shearer J, Graham T, Phillips SM. Gender differences in carbohydrate loading are related to energy intake. J Appl Physiol. 2001 Jul;91(1):225-30. doi: 10.1152/jappl.2001.91.1.225. PMID: 11408434.

    Q: What about ketogenic diets and its impact on female athletes (performance/body composition etc.).

    Burke et al (2020) investigated the effects of high fat low carbohydrate diets on female race walkers and found impaired exercise economy and performance. This data suggests that a high fat diet is not conducive for endurance performance. Endurance athletes should undertake a cost/ risk analysis of consuming a high fat/ low carbohydrate diet and understand the potential impairments that it might have on higher intensity exercise.

    Burke LM. Ketogenic low-CHO, high-fat diet: the future of elite endurance sport? J Physiol. 2021 Feb;599(3):819-843. doi: 10.1113/JP278928. Epub 2020 Jun 10. PMID: 32358802; PMCID: PMC7891323.

    Q: Could the male athletes oxidize [carbohydrate] more because they have more available to be used (if females tend to be under supplied)?

    GSSI oxidation

    Women use more fat and less carbohydrate compared to men during endurance exercise. This is likely due to the higher levels of the female sex hormone estrogen. Studies have found that when estrogen is administered to men higher fat oxidation rates are seen. Although estrogen might explain some of the sex differences in substrate metabolism the exact mechanisms are not fully known and are likely to be multifactorial. A meta-analysis by Cano et al gathered mechanistic insights into the possible reasons for the sex-based differences in substrate utilization and produced the thematic diagram.

    Cano A, Ventura L, Martinez G, Cugusi L, Caria M, Deriu F, Manca A. Analysis of sex-based differences in energy substrate utilization during moderate-intensity aerobic exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2022 Jan;122(1):29-70. doi: 10.1007/s00421-021-04802-5. Epub 2021 Sep 22. Erratum in: Eur J Appl Physiol. 2022 Jul;122(7):1749. PMID: 34550468; PMCID: PMC8748379.

    Q: It appears most of the studies have investigated endurance training and aerobic sports. What (if anything) does the literature indicate about carbohydrate consumption and usage during resistance training in women with the goal of building muscle mass?

    There are some studies that have investigated energy metabolism during anaerobic sprint type exercise. A review by Boisseau & Isacco (2022) conclude that glucose regulation is not different between men and women during short bouts of high intensity exercise. Regarding carbohydrate intake the current carbohydrate recommendations are currently not sex specific and are based on exercise duration. Regardless of exercise type the recommendations state that when training for longer than 60 minutes, the recommended amount of carbohydrate is 30-60 g/h.

    Nathalie Boisseau & Laurie Isacco (2022) Substrate metabolism during exercise: Sexual dimorphism and women’s specificities, European Journal of Sport Science, 22:5, 672-683, DOI: 10.1080/17461391.2021.1943713

    Q: Is there research you can suggest that has investigated post-menopausal female athletes? Q: Be good to get an opinion on nutritional support for peri- & menopausal athletes and if there is a recommended substrate manipulation in those populations? Q: what are the implications for female athletes post menopause?

    Menopausal women may have lower rates of fat oxidation at rest and during exercise compared to pre-menopausal women. This might be explained by the reduction in estrogen levels as well as the decrease in lean mass during menopause. There are currently no specific sports nutrition recommendations for post-menopausal women however in a review by Smith-Ryan et al (2022) it states that 24-h energy expenditure decreases with age, as well as a decrease in skeletal muscle balance and a blunted anabolic response to protein ingestion. These things should be taken into consideration when implementing any dietary recommendations for menopausal women.

    Here is a reference for further reading, although this study was not performed in female athletes: Abildgaard J, Pedersen AT, Green CJ, Harder-Lauridsen NM, Solomon TP, Thomsen C, Juul A, Pedersen M, Pedersen JT, Mortensen OH, Pilegaard H, Pedersen BK, Lindegaard B. Menopause is associated with decreased whole body fat oxidation during exercise. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Jun 1;304(11):E1227-36. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00492.2012. Epub 2013 Apr 2. PMID: 23548615.

    Smith-Ryan AE, Cabre HE, Moore SR. Active Women Across the Lifespan: Nutritional Ingredients to Support Health and Wellness. Sports Med. 2022 Dec;52(Suppl 1):101-117. doi: 10.1007/s40279-022-01755-3. Epub 2022 Sep 29. PMID: 36173598; PMCID: PMC9521557.

    Q: Was body composition recorded when measuring fat v cho use during exercise? i.e... did women have higher body fat and is that why men relied more on cho when exercising in a fasted state. Q: when comparing male and female substrate utilization during fasting endurance exercise were the results adjusted for percentage body fat?

    Women have been found to have greater intramuscular triglycerides concentrations than men, this difference could explain the higher rates of fat oxidation as these lipids stores in the muscle are a significant energy source. In fact, a study by Randell et al (2016) found absolute maximal fat oxidation (MFO) rates to be higher in male athlete compared to females (0.61 and 0.50 g∙min-1 respectively, P < 0.001). However, when expressed relative to fat free mass (FFM), MFO were higher in the females compared to males (MFO/FFM: 11.0 and 10.0 mg∙kg∙FFM-1∙min-1 respectively, P <0.001).

    Steffensen, C. H., Roepstorff, C., Madsen, M., & Kiens, B. (2002). Myocellular triacylglycerol breakdown in females but not in males during exercise. American Journal of Physiology- Endocrinology and Metabolism, 282(3), E634–E642. doi:10. 1152/ajpendo.00078.2001

    Randell RK, Rollo I, Roberts TJ, Dalrymple KJ, Jeukendrup AE, Carter JM. Maximal Fat Oxidation Rates in an Athletic Population. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017 Jan;49(1):133-140. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001084. PMID: 27580144.

    Q: Are there specific recommendations around how much time an athlete can be in a reduced energy availability state before concerns arise?

    In the new IOC consensus statement introduces the term “adaptable low energy availability”. The definition is as follows:

    “Adaptable LEA is exposure to a reduction in energy availability that is associated with benign effects, including mild and quickly reversible changes in biomarkers of various body systems that signal an adaptive partitioning of energy and the plasticity of human physiology. In some cases, the scenario that underpins the reduction in energy availability (eg, monitored and mindful manipulation of body composition or scheduled period of intensified training or competition) might be associated with acute health or performance benefits (eg, increased relative VO2max). Adaptable LEA is typically a short-term experience with minimal (or no) impact on long-term health, well-being or performance. Moderating factors may also alter the expression of outcomes.”

    This paper also states that short-term low energy availability is defined as a few days to weeks, but this does require further investigation.

    Mountjoy M, Ackerman KE, Bailey DM, et al British Journal of Sports Medicine 2023;57:1073-1097

    Q: Did you say that there’s no research on how LEE affects female athletes?

    There is an abundance of research that has been conducted on low energy availability in female athletes. The new IOC statement mentions that since 2018 there have been considerable scientific advancements in the Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (REDs) research field including ~178 REDs and/ or LEA original research publications featuring ~23 822 participants; (80% female).

    Mountjoy M, Ackerman KE, Bailey DM, et al British Journal of Sports Medicine 2023;57:1073-1097

    Q: So, it appears that low energy availability is a problem with females and males. Is this why we see athletes that show no improvements in strength and performance?

    Low energy availability is not evident in all athletes but can affect both male and female athletes. There are some potential REDs performance outcomes that might arise because of problematic low energy availability. Some of these performance outcomes do include decreased muscle strength and power performance. Research into this area has included both female and male athletes.

    Mountjoy M, Ackerman KE, Bailey DM, et al British Journal of Sports Medicine 2023;57:1073-1097

    Q: I work at a high-level tennis academy and with a number of high level teenage girls. I often encounter, when I ask what they have had for fuel, they either under fuel or eat nothing. I have started utilizing little snack bags with little things that they enjoy eating so that they can fuel for their practices etc.  Any thoughts on this?

    This is a great idea! This sounds like an easy and convenient way to increase energy intake.

    Q: What are the top concerns practitioners should be aware of for female athletes in general when referring to carb loading?

    I think practitioners need to be familiar with the science-based carbohydrate recommendations, but with their applied practitioner hat they need to deliver food and drink choices that are practical for the athletes to ingest. If an athlete (male or female) is about to compete in a match, competition, or race then carbohydrate ingestion acutely around the exercise occasion is important, but maybe on lower intensity or rest days the carbohydrate amounts can be reduced. 

    Q: What are your best recommendations on educating parents and coaches who discuss carbohydrates in a bad light and have influenced their athlete's ideas on carbohydrates? Q: for education on the importance of carb intake, what setting do you feel may be best for female athletes to learn about this information?  Should it be from their coach, should an RD be required to meet individually with the athlete? Social media seems to be a great impact on the influence in intake.

    As mentioned in my presentation education is key, how we best deliver the education is yet to be determined and I think this is largely because everyone consumes education in different ways. A lot of athletes use social media but social media posts are unregulated so there is a lot of misinformation. Finding credible sources on social media and directing athletes there would be one approach in helping to educate athletes. I believe that nutrition education should ultimately come from the RD, but I think there are opportunities to educate the whole multi-disciplinary team on certain nutrition topics so that everyone is speaking with the same voice.

    Q: While using the -Q, let us say an athlete has scored >8. But it is the long-term injury sub-scale that has caused the score to be this high. The other two sub-scales of GI and Menses look fine. In that case, should we still consider the athlete to be Low on energy?

    The IOC REDs Clinical Assessment Tool (CAT2) is recommended as a way to determine the severity of low energy availability in your athletes.  

    GSSI CAT2

     

    Mountjoy M, Ackerman KE, Bailey DM, et al British Journal of Sports Medicine 2023;57:1073-1097

    Q: looking at iron levels in females, have you done research in showing the need to increase iron supplementation in female athletes?

    Iron status and regulation in female athletes may be influenced by fluctuations in ovarian hormones and menstruation blood loss. Accordingly, the RDI for iron is 2.5 times higher in females, compared to males. There is a good article on the GSSI website on this topic:

    https://www.gssiweb.org/en/sports-science-exchange/Article/micronutrient-considerations-for-the-female-athlete  

    Q: Would you mind listing the references you cited?

    • Cowley et al., (2021) Sports Med. Women Sport Phys. Activity J. 29, 146–151
    • Coyle et al. 1986, J Appl Physiol 61:165-172.
    • Tarnopolsky, Atkinson, Phillips, & MacDougall,1995
    • Tarnopolsky, Zawada, , Richmond, Carter, Shearer, Graham, & Phillips (2001).
    • Hackney A.C. Horm. Metab. Res. 1990;22:647.
    • Joint Positon Statement: Nutrition and Athletic Performance.Med Sci Sports Exerc. 48:543-68, 2016.
    • Tanaka, Tanaka & Landis 1995, Int J Sport Nutr, 5:206-214.
    • Moss SL et al (2021) Eur J Sport Sci. 21:861-870.
    • Reed JL et al (2014) J Sport Sci. 32:1499-1509
    • Martin L et al (2006) J Sport Sci Med. 5:130-137.
    • McHaffrie SJ et al(2022). Sci Med Football. 6(5):675-685.
    • Devries et al (2006) Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. Oct;291(4):R1120-8
    • Cano et al Eur J Appl Physiol. 2022 Jan;122(1):29
    • Wallis et al (2006) Am J Physiol Endo Meta. 290(4),E708–E715
    • Derives et al (2006) Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. Oct;291(4):R1120-8;
    • Hackney, A. C. (1999) ActaPhysiol Scandi,167(3),273–274.
    • Zderic, T. W., Coggan, A. R., & Ruby, B. C. (2001). .J Appl Physiol,90(2), 447–453
    • Heikura et al (2022) Eur J Sport Sci. 5:709-719.
    • Ackerman et al (2019 Energy Deficiency in Sport. Br. J. Sports Med. 53:628-633
    • Mountjoy M, Ackerman KE, Bailey DM, et al British Journal of Sports Medicine 2023;57:1073-1097
  • A Perspective on Anti-Obesity Medications

    by Greg Margason | Oct 24, 2023

    HT AOMAn internet search of “anti-obesity medications (AOMs)” will land over 63+ million hits in under a second. The surge in the popularity of AOMs is fostered by various media outlets (news, social, marketing, research) adding to increased patient demand. Trilliant Health/STAT reported that in 2022, ~3.6 million Americans were taking an AOM and estimate that this will increase by 35% by the end of 2023. 

    After spending a combined 50+ years researching and translating lifestyle recommendations into obesity practice, we weren’t surprised when the public appetite for “Ozempic-like” medications exploded. Putting the costs, celebrity endorsements, and supply chain issues aside, let’s break it down, talk data and what this means for the physical activity profession. 

    You may hear these therapies referred to by several different names — second- or third-generation AOMs, incretin-based hormone agonists, or nutrition-stimulated hormone-based therapies (NuSHs). But these agents are not all “Ozempic®,” as people regularly refer to them. This likely happened because semaglutide was the first of these new agents that took the diabetes (Ozempic®) and obesity (Wagovy ) worlds by storm. With FDA approval for weight loss in 2021, semaglutide 2.4 m.g. demonstrated over double the weight loss compared to previous medications. The STEP-3 trial boasted a weight reduction after 68 weeks of -16.0% compared to -5.7% with lifestyle only, and semaglutide resulted in 86.6% achieving a clinically meaningful weight loss of >5%. 

    While the impact of these medications for weight reduction brings new excitement, the base mechanism of action is not new. In fact, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), has been around for years, there are several positive clinical trials, and numerous trials are underway to continue exploring the safety and effectiveness of these agents. 

    Next up and under FDA review for weight loss is tirzepatide, which is a dual agonist (GLP-1/GIP) that has demonstrated ~20% weight loss after 72 weeks. More agents are in the pipeline, with STAT reporting ~70 promising single, dual, and triple NuSHs and other therapies in clinical testing and development. 

    It is hard to ignore the impact of these agents for weight loss compared to prominent behavioral lifestyle interventions like Look AHEAD and the Diabetes Prevention Program which have demonstrated a 5-10% average reduction in weight at one year. Yet, the benefits of the medications aren’t just about the number on the scale. Already mentioned was their impact in diabetes care, and recent pre-published evidence from the SELECT trial demonstrates a positive influence on cardiovascular health. 

    We are not denying that lifestyle interventions, which include physical activity, can be effective for weight loss. However, there are still challenges that we must recognize. For example, not all individuals respond to lifestyle interventions, there is variability in response, and for the people that do respond, long-term maintenance of weight loss and prevention of weigh recurrence remains difficult. 

    How do we move forward in this rapidly changing landscape that includes these powerful new therapeutic agents for weight loss? It begins by being honest about challenges and opportunities for physical activity professionals. 

    The Challenges:

    On these agents, patients: 

    • Will lose significant weight without engaging in activity, 

    • Will improve many health parameters without engaging in activity, and 

    • May not see the value of activity specifically for weight loss. 

    Despite these challenges, this may open the door for new physical activity opportunities. 

    The Opportunities:

    We can now: 

    • Pivot from doses and intensities of physical activity for weight loss and prescribe based on improving health in patients using AOMs, 

    • Target physical activity for the independent health benefits not realized with weight loss alone, and 

    • Support patients on their holistic weight loss journey as a part of an integrated team of healthcare professionals. 

    This is a redirect for many of us who realize the powerful benefits of physical activity. We must step away from positioning it as “physical activity vs. medication.” This type of thinking puts the method first rather than the patient. 

    It is important for exercise professionals to recognize that excess weight and adiposity are due to the complex collision of biology, environment, and behavior. Obesity is not from an absence of willpower; thus, the basic premise to eat less and move more is difficult for many patients, and this may partially explain the variability in weight loss response. These medications help patients gain better control over their eating behaviors; however, they don’t magically improve physical activity engagement. In fact, our group recently presented data at Obesity Week 2023 demonstrating that the majority of patients taking these medications don’t initiate physical activity, and of those who do, most are not engaging in levels consistent with public health guidelines. 

    Just as obesity is a multifaceted and complex disease, our group is taking the position that approaches to obesity care in this new age cannot be one size fits all — and this includes exercise prescriptions. We are using a bio-behavioral approach that prioritizes patient and clinician perspectives and biological responses to develop programming that may impact clinical implementation and guidelines. It may not be enough to just assume that the same physical activity and lifestyle approaches layered onto AOM therapies will have the same impact as previously demonstrated. After all, our recent data indicates that the majority of patients already know and have been told repeatedly by health care professionals that it is “important that they exercise.” There are likely deeper behavioral factors that continue to keep these patients from engaging in physical activity. 

    Exercise professionals must ensure that they are not contributing to the stigma that many patients taking AOMs report, which includes feeling like or being told that they are “taking the easy way out.” For physical activity counseling to be effective, it is going to require appropriately trained and certified exercise professionals that want to work with patients taking AOMs and clinicians prescribing these agents. 

    The profession has embraced physical activity as a complement to treatment for other chronic conditions, such as with cardiac rehabilitation. Now that AOMs provide effective medical treatment for obesity, it is time to embrace this opportunity as the next frontier in integrated patient care. 

    Learn more from Drs. Rogers and Jakicic, along with their board-certified obesity clinician colleagues, at the IDEA & ACSM Health and Fitness Summit and at ACSM's Annual Meeting

    Related CEC Courses: 
    Rethinking Obesity Treatment with Fitness Pros (1 CEC)
    Training the Adult with Obesity (3 CECs)

    ReneeJRogers Headshot
    Dr. Renee J. Rogers, Ph.D., FACSM,
    is a senior scientist at the University of Kansas Medical Center and also works as an independent healthy lifestyle consultant and strategist. She chairs ACSM’s Strategic Health Initiative on Behavioral Strategies and Summit Program Committees. Dr. Rogers is an expert in bio-behavioral intervention design with a focus on relevant engagement approaches that blends her 20+ years of experience working in exercise physiology, behavior change, and weight management. 

    John Jakicic
    Dr. John M. Jakicic, Ph.D., FACSM,
    is a professor of internal medicine in the Division of Physical Activity and Weight Management at the University of Kansas Medical Center. He is the chair of the ACSM’s Strategic Health Initiative on Obesity. Dr. Jakicic is an internationally recognized expert on body weight regulation and obesity treatment, with a particular expertise on the role of physical activity, and he has authored or co-authored over 300 peer-reviewed papers and book chapters. 

  • Youth Football Health & Safety, Episode 1

    by Caitlin Kinser | Oct 24, 2023

    Joining the Healthy Youth Sports podcast is Thayne Munce,Ph.D., FACSM, an Assistant Scientist and Director of the Athletic Health & Performance Lab at Sanford Research, a division of Sanford Health in Sioux Falls, SD. Dr. Munce is a research sports scientist who studies the effects of repetitive head impacts and concussion on brain health in athletes. His work is highlighted by a multi-year study investigating head impact exposure and neurologic function in youth football players. We have an outstanding show for you shining a spotlight on a very important topic of Youth Football Health & Safety. Let's jump right in!

    Follow Dr. Munce on Twitter

    Follow NYSHSI on Twitter

    Additional resources:

    Concussion: Not Just a Football Injury | Handout/Flyer

    Recommendations and Guidelines for Minimizing Head Impact Exposure and Concussion Risk in Football

  • Sleep and the Certified Exercise Professional

    by Greg Margason | Oct 24, 2023
    Sleep and the cert pro

    Being an exercise professional, particularly a self-employed one, puts you in an uncomfortable position: You know that sleep is important — critically important, even — for your health, but it also seems to get in the way of all the things you need to do to. The old adage “Sleep, work, social life — you can only pick two” is a little different for the cert pro. Often the situation seems more like “Sleep or work — you can only pick one.” (And notice neither formulation includes “family life” or “self-care,” another pair of variables that, frankly, are probably the most important of all.)

    So, how significant is sleep? Is it really something we can sacrifice? What exactly are we sacrificing? And should we give it more pride of place in our lives?

    The benefits of a good night’s sleep

    First, let’s talk about the light at the end of the tunnel. What will we gain if we put in the effort and manage to consistently get enough shut-eye? According to John D. Chase, M.S., and John R. Sirard, Ph.D., who penned an article on the subject for the ACSM American Fitness Index®, there are a laundry list of benefits. For most adults, seven to nine hours of sleep per night is ideal, and hitting that mark will improve cognition, decrease stress and anxiety, and lower the risk of developing cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. It also seems to have a preventative effect on certain types of cancer.

    Meanwhile, Melissa W. Roti, Ph.D., FACSM, director of Westfield State University’s Exercise Science Program, notes anecdotally in another Fitness Index article that as she began to improve her sleep schedule, she also began losing weight. “It wasn’t dramatic,” she writes. “But it was those couple extra pounds I had had a difficult time getting rid of.”

    This is all to say that as people focused on improving health, we really can’t overlook sleep.

    The downsides of missing sleep

    Obviously, if getting enough sleep confers the above benefits, then not getting enough sleep robs you of them. Plus, as Roti later notes, lack of sleep is associated with increased body mass — and, let’s be realistic, not in a “Look at these gains!” sort of way. Beyond that, even sporadic loss of sleep, like getting less than six hours in a single night or multiple nights, can lower your inhibition, impair your memory and increase your reaction time the next day. To be pessimistic: That could make it harder for you to remember your clients’ routines (or worse, names), put you in a position to make risky business decisions, or even make you more likely to injure yourself during your own workouts or when demonstrating movements to your clients.

    The impact of sleep loss on physical performance is less clear, but the strongest signal seems to be that losing sleep is most likely to have a detrimental effect on aerobic workouts — more specifically, extended submaximal aerobic work. If you’re an endurance athlete, or you lead aerobically intensive exercise classes, this could be a significant concern. But it also doesn’t seem like to much of a stretch to assume that increased reaction time, stress, and cardiovascular issues are all likely to harm your workouts as well.

    Interestingly, you may also experience different outcomes depending on whether you stay up too late or get up too early. Chase and Sirard note that in one comprehensive study, accelerometer data showed that subjects who woke up very early subsequently performed less physical activity than those who stayed up very late. More specifically, those who woke up too early didn’t perform as much vigorous-intensity physical activity as those who’d stayed up. Is this a win for the night owls? It’s far too soon to say.

    What to do

    According to Roti, consistency is key to improving your sleep: “Between-day variability also plays a role, with increased variability contributing to lower quality sleep.” Meaning, getting to bed and getting up at the same time is also important — if you fall asleep at 10 p.m. on Mondays and wake up at 6 a.m. the following morning but go to sleep at 1 a.m. on Tuesdays and wake up at 10 a.m. the next day, you’re not going to see the same benefits. As with exercise, consistency is key. Anything you can do to try to regularize your calendar is going to help you in this department, maybe doing your best to cluster clients in the morning or in the evening rather than scattered across the day.

    Meanwhile, a team of authors from Winthrop University penned a third sleep-related Fitness Index blog covering the role stress plays in one’s quality of sleep. They likewise recommend keeping a regular sleep schedule, but they also suggest creating a consistent bedtime routine that will help prime your mind and body for sleep and avoiding both caffeine and screens for at least 90 minutes before bedtime. The also suggest performing deep breathing exercises to reduce stress, which makes it harder for us to get to sleep — and of course exercising three to five times per week, at least thirty minutes per session. But you knew that part already.

    Related CEC Courses:
    The 24-Hour Movement Paradigm and Sleep (1 CEC)
    Industry Presented Webinar: Sleep Tactics for Better Performance (1 CEC)

  • ACSM Foundation Grants, A Recipient’s Perspective: Well-Timed Funding Supports New Lab

    by Caitlin Kinser | Oct 19, 2023

    blog jenna gillen grantResearchers: If you’re wondering whether it’s worth applying for an ACSM Foundation research grant, consider Dr. Jenna Gillen’s story. 

    Gillen, an assistant professor in the Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education at the University of Toronto, leads an exercise metabolism research lab. When she applied for and was subsequently awarded an ACSM Research Endowment grant, she was at a critical point her career. 

    “It was the first grant I received as a new principal investigator,” Gillen says. “I had just gotten my faculty position, and so I was really grateful for this funding to help start my research lab.” 

    Gillen, who was inspired to pursue kinesiology and nutrition research after a particularly fruitful mentorship in her fourth year of undergraduate studies with Dr. Martin Gibala, now researches the effects of different exercise and nutrition strategies on carbohydrate metabolism, both from the perspective of basic science and in terms of overall health outcomes. 

    “We know that exercise is good for blood sugar regulation and improves insulin sensitivity, but there are still unanswered questions regarding the types of exercise that are most effective and the underlying mechanisms,” Gillen says. 

    The ACSM funding allowed Gillen to get her lab up and running; the initial study she was pursuing, which led to the publication of “Interrupting prolonged sitting with repeated chair stands or short walks reduces postprandial insulinemia in healthy adults,” required proficiency in a number of research techniques, from exercise testing, blood sampling, muscle biopsies, nutritional preparation, wet lab analysis, and molecular biology. (Gillen and her team would go on to publish a second manuscript, “Walking or body weight squat ‘activity snacks’ increase dietary amino acid utilization for myofibrillar protein synthesis during prolonged sitting,” under the auspices of the same ACSM grant.) 

    “All of those methods were required to conduct the project that ACSM gave us the funding for, so it allowed me to establish these methods within my lab at the University of Toronto,” she says. 

    The boost from ACSM put Gillen in a position to train up her graduate students in these critical techniques, giving her and her team the foundation they needed to pursue their subsequent research. The grant also supported a fruitful partnership for Gillen and her trainees with another member of the Toronto faculty: 

    “This project wouldn’t have been possible without the support of my faculty colleague Daniel Moore, who is an expert in protein metabolism and exercise,” Gillen says. “We collaborated on the project to explore the effect of activity snacks on both postprandial glucose and protein metabolism. The grant assisted in supporting that collaboration, which also resulted in an enriching and cross-disciplinary learning environment for our trainees.” 

    But because Gillen received the grant in 2019, the team found their work somewhat unexpectedly and abruptly interrupted by COVID-19 lockdowns, and they weren’t able to get into the lab for some time. Fortunately, they had already completed most of their initial research, and ACSM was able to bridge the gap. 

    “ACSM was really helpful. They were very generous with grant extensions, which allowed us to fulfill the project goals under fairly challenging times,” Gillen says. 

    Despite the interruption, the research itself was rather fast paced. In a short while, Gillen was able to use results gleaned from the original ACSM-backed work to apply for further funding — a key step for a new PI. 

    “We ran the study quite quickly,” Gillen says. “We were able to get ethics approval right away. The project took about a year to run, and then we were quick on analysis. So within two to three years of getting the grant, we were able to use some of that data to apply to more grants.” 

    Gillen and her team are now working on a number of projects focused on understanding how exercise alters insulin sensitivity and associated mechanisms. For example, they are investigating if pre- and post-exercise nutrition modulate the glycemic effects of exercise, and exploring if there are sex-based differences in skeletal muscle mechanisms underlying exercise-induced improvements in insulin sensitivity. 

    What would Gillen say to someone on the fence about applying for an ACSM Foundation grant? 

    “It’s such a great opportunity to generate initial data that could be leveraged for larger grants and additional projects,” she notes. “Also, getting a grant from ACSM, a prestigious exercise organization — having that on my CV is valuable as well. All around it was a fantastic opportunity.” 

    Applications for ACSM Foundation research grants are due Nov. 10.

    Learn More And Apply

12345678910...